Book cover of A Brief History of Thought by Luc Ferry

A Brief History of Thought

by Luc Ferry

17 min readRating: 4.0 (3,942 ratings)
Genres
Buy full book on Amazon

Introduction

Philosophy can often seem like a daunting subject, filled with complex ideas and difficult language. However, at its core, philosophy is about understanding what it means to be human and how we should live our lives. In "A Brief History of Thought," Luc Ferry takes readers on a journey through the major phases of Western philosophy, from ancient Greek thought to modern-day humanism.

This book offers a clear and accessible path through the sometimes confusing world of philosophical ideas. It breaks down complex concepts into understandable language, showing how different schools of thought have tried to help people overcome their fear of death and live more meaningful lives.

As we explore the history of Western philosophy, we'll see how ideas have evolved over time, how different thinkers have built upon or challenged the work of their predecessors, and how philosophical concepts have shaped our understanding of the world and our place in it.

The Nature of Philosophy

Before diving into the history of philosophy, it's important to understand what philosophy is and how it works. While there's no universally accepted definition, we can think of philosophy as a way of addressing fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, and how we should live our lives.

The Human Condition and the Fear of Death

One of the key aspects that sets humans apart from other animals is our awareness of our own mortality. We know that we will die someday, and this knowledge can create a deep sense of anxiety and fear. This fear of death is a central concern in both philosophy and religion, though they approach it in different ways.

Religion, particularly Christianity, offers salvation through faith. It promises that if we believe in God, we'll be saved and reunited with our loved ones in heaven. Philosophy, on the other hand, seeks to conquer the fear of death through reason and understanding. By examining ourselves, others, and the world around us, philosophy aims to help us come to terms with our mortality and live more fulfilling lives.

The Three Dimensions of Philosophy

Philosophical thinking can be broken down into three main stages or dimensions:

  1. Theory: This involves deep thinking about the nature of reality. It also examines the tools we use to understand reality, such as how we determine causes and effects, or how we establish truth.

  2. Ethics: This more practical dimension focuses on human behavior and how we should interact with one another. It asks questions about right and wrong, and how we should live our lives.

  3. Wisdom or Salvation: This is the ultimate goal of both philosophy and religion. It seeks to find meaning in life and aims to help us live fulfilled lives free from the fear of death.

With this framework in mind, let's explore how different philosophical traditions have approached these dimensions throughout history.

Ancient Greek Philosophy: The Stoics

One of the most influential schools of thought in ancient Greece was Stoicism, founded by Zeno of Citium in the 3rd century BC. The Stoic philosophy offers a comprehensive worldview that addresses all three dimensions of philosophical thinking.

Stoic Theory: The Universe as a Living Organism

The Stoics had a unique view of the universe. They saw it as similar to a living animal, with each part playing a specific role in the functioning of the whole. This created a harmonious, pre-ordained natural order that the Stoics called the kosmos.

In this view, everything in the universe had its proper place and purpose. The human body and our natural environment, for example, were seen as perfectly designed to provide us with everything we need. We have eyes to see, legs to move, intelligence to solve problems, and natural resources to sustain us.

Stoic Ethics: Living in Harmony with Nature

Given their view of the universe as a perfectly ordered system, Stoic ethics was relatively straightforward. Whatever went against the cosmic order was considered wrong or bad, while actions in harmony with this order were right and good.

To be an ethical person, according to the Stoics, one had to act in accordance with the natural order of things and fulfill the duties of their assigned place in the cosmos. This idea can be troubling from a modern perspective, as it could be used to justify social inequalities. For instance, in Stoic thought, if someone was born a slave, that was considered their rightful place in the cosmic order, and they were expected to accept it.

Stoic Salvation: Overcoming the Fear of Death

The Stoics had their own approach to achieving salvation or overcoming the fear of death. They believed that by contemplating the natural order of the universe and living in harmony with it, one could come to understand that death wasn't truly an end.

Instead, the Stoics saw death as a transition from one state of being to another within the eternal natural order. Rather than fearing death as a final ending, they viewed it as just another part of the cosmic journey. This perspective aimed to help people live without the constant anxiety of mortality.

The Rise of Christianity

While Christianity isn't a philosophy in the strict sense, as it emphasizes faith over reason, it had a profound impact on Western thought and effectively displaced Greek philosophy for many centuries.

Christian Theory: Logos Embodied in Christ

Christianity shifted the concept of logos - universal, unquestionable logic and reason - away from the structure of the universe and embodied it in the person of Jesus Christ. This was a radical change, as it personalized the abstract concept of logos into a relatable individual.

Moreover, Christianity introduced a new way of understanding reality. Instead of relying on reason alone, it argued that faith was necessary to truly understand the nature of things. Christians were called to place their faith in Jesus, who was seen as the embodiment of logos and the spokesperson for the supreme creator.

Christian Ethics: Freedom of Choice and Universal Equality

Christianity brought about three major changes in ethical thinking:

  1. Rejection of Natural Hierarchy: Unlike the Greeks, who saw natural inequalities as proof of a divinely ordained social order, Christianity insisted that these differences were insignificant. What mattered were the choices people made with what they had been given.

  2. Importance of the Inner Spiritual World: Christianity placed greater emphasis on the inner spiritual life than on the external world of nature. This is why early Christian martyrs were willing to die for their faith - they believed the inner realm of God was superior to the outer realm of man.

  3. Universal Human Equality: By personalizing logos in Christ and maintaining that everyone was equally a "creature of God," Christianity laid the groundwork for the modern concept of universal human equality.

Christian Salvation: Personal Immortality

Christianity offered a new and appealing form of salvation. It promised believers a personal form of eternity - individual immortality in the Kingdom of Heaven. Christians could overcome their fear of death by believing that after death, they would retain their individual personalities and consciousnesses and be reunited with their loved ones.

This personalized vision of the afterlife was a significant departure from previous philosophical and religious ideas and proved to be incredibly influential in Western thought.

The Scientific Revolution and the Birth of Modern Philosophy

The 16th and 17th centuries saw a dramatic shift in human understanding of the universe. The scientific revolution, led by thinkers like Nicolaus Copernicus and Isaac Newton, presented a radically different view of the cosmos.

A New Understanding of the Universe

The new scientific models depicted the universe as an infinite void, with Earth no longer at its center. Moreover, the universe was now understood to be governed by forces that could be precisely measured and calculated.

This new understanding created a profound sense of unease. The comforting idea of a divinely ordered cosmos was replaced by a seemingly cold, mechanical universe. People needed new ways to interpret their place in the world and find meaning in their existence.

Descartes and the Birth of Modern Philosophy

French philosopher René Descartes played a crucial role in ushering in modern philosophy. He took the doubt unleashed by the scientific revolution and turned it into a tool for philosophical inquiry.

Descartes introduced the concept of radical skepticism, advocating for a "clean slate" approach to understanding reality. He argued that we should reject all prior beliefs and assumptions and start our inquiries afresh. This attitude of critical thinking became a cornerstone of modern philosophy.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Modern Humanism

Building on Descartes' work, Jean-Jacques Rousseau founded modern humanism. Rousseau placed human beings at the center of his worldview, arguing that by understanding ourselves, we could better understand the world around us.

Crucially, Rousseau introduced the concept of human perfectibility. Unlike animals, which operate within predictable patterns of behavior, humans have the capacity to change and improve themselves throughout their lives. This idea of human freedom and potential for growth became a central tenet of modern humanism.

New Forms of Salvation

With traditional religious ideas of salvation becoming less convincing for some, new "religions of earthly salvation" emerged. These were pseudo-religions centered on human beings rather than gods, promising utopias on Earth. Ideologies like communism, scientism, and extreme forms of patriotism offered adherents a sense of meaning and purpose by providing objectives supposedly more important than individual lives.

Immanuel Kant and the Ethics of Freedom

The new emphasis on human freedom raised important questions about ethics. If humans were truly free, how could their behavior be structured according to clear ethical guidelines?

Kant's Ethical Theory

German philosopher Immanuel Kant tackled this question in the 18th century, developing an ethical theory that would become the basis of modern humanism. Kant's theory had two main components:

  1. Disinterested Actions: Kant argued that truly ethical conduct depends on actions that are not driven by personal or selfish motives. While humans, like all animals, have natural urges and desires, our ability to ignore these impulses is what makes us uniquely human. Ethical action, according to Kant, requires us to set aside our egotistical impulses and act in a disinterested manner.

  2. Universal Common Good: Kant insisted that ethical actions should be directed toward a universal, common good. This means that good behavior isn't linked to the interests of your family or nation, but to the welfare of humanity as a whole.

The Categorical Imperative

Kant's ethical theory led him to formulate what he called the categorical imperative - an unquestionable moral commandment. This imperative states that we should act only according to rules that we could will to become universal laws.

In other words, before taking any action, we should ask ourselves: "What if everyone did this?" If the answer would lead to a world we wouldn't want to live in, then the action is not ethical.

This approach to ethics represented a significant departure from earlier philosophies. Unlike the Stoics, who sought to conform to the "natural" order of things, Kant's ethics often required us to override our natural desires in service of a higher moral law.

Implications of Kant's Ethics

Kant's ethical theory had far-reaching implications. It provided a rational basis for moral behavior that didn't rely on religious faith or social conventions. It also emphasized the dignity and worth of every individual, as each person was seen as capable of moral reasoning and deserving of respect.

However, Kant's ethics also set a high bar for moral behavior. Always acting according to universal principles, without regard for personal benefit or emotional attachments, is a challenging ideal to live up to.

Despite these challenges, Kant's ideas formed the foundation of modern humanism and continue to influence ethical thinking to this day. They represent a high point in the development of Enlightenment philosophy, emphasizing human reason and universal principles.

Friedrich Nietzsche: The Challenge to Humanism

Just as Kant's ideas were becoming established, another German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, emerged to challenge them. Nietzsche's philosophy represented a radical break from traditional Western thought and ushered in the age of postmodern philosophy.

Nietzsche's Critique of Nihilism

Nietzsche's philosophy can be seen as a crusade against what he called nihilism. For Nietzsche, all doctrines - from Christianity and humanism to socialism - were nihilistic because they supposed that there was a better world to be had and that we should sideline the present moment in favor of striving for it.

Nietzsche saw these ideologies as destroying and denying the importance and value of life as it is. He insisted that there are no utopias or values that give meaning to life. Instead, the meaning of life is life itself.

Active and Reactive Forces

Nietzsche viewed the world as comprising two different types of forces: active and reactive. These forces were seen as chaotic and always in conflict, challenging the Greek ideas of cosmic harmony.

Reactive forces function by denying and repressing other forces. Religion, science, and modern philosophy, according to Nietzsche, all react against ordinary human life by claiming to represent ideal truths that are superior to human experience.

Active forces, on the other hand, don't need to repress other forces. Nietzsche saw art as the natural home for active forces because it opens up new perspectives without needing to prove its predecessors wrong.

The Will to Power and the Grand Style

Nietzsche didn't argue for the elimination of reactive forces in favor of active ones. Instead, he held that we must strive to balance these two types of forces. When we achieve this balance, life becomes more vivid and vibrant. Nietzsche called the active desire to achieve this perfect balance the "will to power."

If we can teach our active and reactive forces to cooperate, we live life intensely and fully - no longer torn apart by our reactive forces of regret and self-doubt. Nietzsche called the attainment of this the "grand style" - his version of salvation.

Nietzsche's Legacy

Nietzsche's willingness to forge a new philosophical path - away from the tenets of modern humanism - made him a founder of postmodern thinking. His ideas challenged the foundations of Western philosophy and opened up new ways of thinking about morality, truth, and the human condition.

However, Nietzsche's philosophy also raised difficult questions. If we're constantly trying to deconstruct all our values and thought systems, and if we maintain that there's nothing superior to the here and now, where does that leave us? This challenge to established values and meaning would become a central issue in postmodern thought.

Contemporary Humanism: A New Synthesis

In the wake of Nietzsche's critique and the rise of postmodern thinking, a new form of humanism has emerged. This contemporary humanism attempts to incorporate the insights of postmodernism while still maintaining some of the core values of classical humanism.

Transcendence in the Here-and-Now

Contemporary humanism rejects the "religions of earthly salvation" common to classical humanists, but it doesn't fully agree with Nietzsche's assertion that only the real world of experience exists. Instead, it proposes that some things are transcendent - external and superior to ourselves - but that this transcendence exists in the here-and-now.

German philosopher Edmund Husserl illustrated this idea with a simple analogy involving a matchbox. We know a matchbox has six sides, but when we hold it up to our eyes, no matter how we hold it, we can only ever see three sides at once. This is also true for reality - whichever angle we view life from, there are sides to it we can't see at the moment, some of which are transcendental.

Limited Human Knowledge

By admitting the existence of transcendence in the here-and-now, contemporary humanism also acknowledges that human knowledge is limited and cannot be omniscient. This breaks with classical humanism by rejecting "absolute knowledge" and naive faith in human science.

We can see transcendence more concretely in things like truth and beauty. Humans cannot invent the truth that 1 + 1 = 2; likewise, a painter doesn't invent the beauty contained in her artwork. These truths exist independently of human invention or perception.

New Ethics for a New Age

Contemporary humanism offers a different approach to ethics as well. Taking a cue from Nietzsche's critique of values supposedly superior to life, it centers its values on life itself. These new transcendent values are not vertical, like patriotism or religious devotion, but horizontal.

Contemporary humanists take a collective view of humanity, and their values center upon their fellow human beings, not abstract ideas "superior" to them. This approach aligns with the values of modern Western democracies, where few would sacrifice their lives for God or a political ideology.

Facing Mortality

Unfortunately, contemporary humanism can't offer the kind of salvation where the fear of death is removed entirely. Instead, it seeks to harness this fear, using it to determine what we need to do in the present moment for humanity as a whole.

This approach encourages us to live meaningful lives and contribute positively to the world, not because we'll be rewarded in an afterlife, but because our actions have real impacts on the lives of others and on the future of humanity.

The Evolution of Western Thought: A Recap

As we've seen, the history of Western thought can be roughly divided into five defining stages:

  1. Greek Philosophy: Exemplified by the Stoics, who saw the universe as a perfectly ordered system and sought to live in harmony with it.

  2. Christianity: Which personalized the concept of logos in Jesus Christ and offered a vision of personal immortality.

  3. Humanism: Emerging from the scientific revolution and emphasizing human reason and potential.

  4. Postmodernism: Initiated by Nietzsche, challenging established values and emphasizing the here-and-now.

  5. Contemporary Philosophy: Attempting to synthesize insights from postmodernism with some of the core values of humanism.

Each of these stages represented a radical departure from the tenets of its predecessors, holding different ideas in all three of the main dimensions of philosophy: theory, ethics, and salvation.

Final Thoughts

"A Brief History of Thought" takes us on a journey through the evolution of Western philosophy, showing how our understanding of the world and our place in it has changed over time. From the cosmic order of the Stoics to the radical freedom proposed by Nietzsche, and from the promise of heavenly salvation in Christianity to the earthly focus of contemporary humanism, we see a constant struggle to make sense of our existence and find meaning in our lives.

What emerges from this history is not a single, definitive answer to life's big questions, but rather a rich tapestry of ideas that continue to shape our thinking today. Contemporary humanism, with its attempt to balance the insights of postmodernism with the values of classical humanism, offers a promising path forward. It acknowledges the limitations of human knowledge while still affirming the value of human life and the importance of ethical behavior.

As we face the challenges of the 21st century, the ideas explored in this book remain as relevant as ever. The fear of death, the search for meaning, the question of how to live ethically - these are timeless human concerns that philosophy continues to grapple with.

By understanding the history of these ideas, we gain valuable perspectives on our own lives and the world around us. We see that our current ways of thinking are not inevitable or unchangeable, but the result of centuries of intellectual evolution. This understanding can empower us to think critically about our beliefs and values, and to continue the philosophical tradition of seeking wisdom and understanding.

In the end, while philosophy may not provide us with easy answers, it equips us with tools to ask better questions and to approach life's challenges with greater clarity and insight. As we navigate the complexities of modern life, the rich history of Western thought offers us a valuable guide, helping us to live more thoughtfully, ethically, and meaningfully in the face of an uncertain future.

Books like A Brief History of Thought