Book cover of Angrynomics by Eric Lonergan

Eric Lonergan

Angrynomics

Reading time icon10 min readRating icon3.9 (769 ratings)

Why, in the midst of economic growth and innovation, do millions feel abandoned, angry, and unheard?

1. Anger: A Double-Edged Sword

Contrary to its negative perception, anger can act as a social force for good – but only when directed at real issues. Historically, justifiable anger has driven positive changes. For instance, moral outrage can rally individuals, hold wrongdoers accountable, and demand systemic corrections. When Iceland's officials were exposed in the Panama Papers scandal, justified communal anger led citizens to demand, and win, political change through protests.

On the flip side, unchecked anger can divide people through tribalism. This type of anger thrives on us-versus-them mentality, categorizing individuals into groups and fueling fear. Politicians often exploit this emotional vulnerability by scapegoating particular groups, such as immigrants or minority communities, to build support without offering practical solutions.

The interplay of these two types of anger often determines societal outcomes. Anger channeled toward injustice strengthens societies, as seen in movements against corruption. In contrast, tribal anger leads to division and stagnation, diverting energy from meaningful reforms.

Examples

  • Iceland’s protests toppled a corrupt government, driven by moral outrage.
  • In the U.S., tribal anger was fostered during the 2016 elections, redirecting frustrations toward immigrant populations.
  • The civil rights movements in the mid-20th century demonstrated justifiable anger as a catalyst for meaningful change.

2. Economic Insecurity Fuels Public Outrage

For decades, rising inequality and slow wage growth have created a backdrop of discontent. Many feel the promises of modern capitalism – prosperity, opportunity, and security – have been broken. The 2008 global financial crisis, for example, exposed structural flaws. Millions of individuals lost their homes or jobs while corporations were bailed out, sparking widespread public anger.

Economic policies since the 1970s have generally favored the wealthy, exacerbating income disparities. Tax cuts and deregulations allowed the richest 1% to amass disproportionate gains, leaving many others in stagnation. This sense of abandonment grows in rural or small-town areas that see few of the benefits flowing to major cities.

Inequitable systems and unresponsive politics breed distrust. Many citizens end up angry not just about economic inequality but also about leaders who appear indifferent. This frustration often sparks protests and fuels movements demanding accountability.

Examples

  • After the 2008 crash, Spain’s housing crisis left families homeless while banks were rescued.
  • Over the past 40 years in the U.S., the real median wage has barely improved.
  • Movements like Occupy Wall Street emerged to demand economic fairness.

3. Capitalism Needs Regular Upgrades

Capitalism is like technology – it evolves over time based on societal needs but can "crash" when neglected. The Great Depression, for example, ended the era of unregulated markets and led to new interventions like Keynesian economics. Post-World War II policies built a thriving middle class using these frameworks.

However, the current model of neoliberal capitalism has run its course. Introduced in the 1970s, this approach heavily prioritizes markets over government intervention. While it has enabled economic growth, it has also created extreme inequality and instability, making it unsustainable in its current form.

Neglected maintenance of capitalism after the 2008 crash has left unresolved issues. Without updates to the system, such as fair wealth distribution or stronger regulatory measures, the same problems persist, compounding public frustration.

Examples

  • The Great Depression led to the New Deal, a Keynesian framework addressing unemploymnt.
  • Postwar Japan’s economic policies stimulated growth and equitable wealth.
  • The 2008 global crisis highlighted unresolved bugs in neoliberal economic systems.

4. Economic Stress Makes Daily Life Harder

Economic challenges don’t just affect the numbers; they impact daily well-being. Competitive markets ask workers to constantly adapt, learn new skills, or face the fear of becoming obsolete. On top of this, automation looms as a perceived – if not fully realized – threat, leaving many workers anxious about job security.

Generational disparities pile on additional stress. Younger workers often struggle with student debt, expensive housing, and fewer welfare protections, a worsening reality compared to the benefits enjoyed by older generations. Meanwhile, in struggling towns, the presence of immigrants is wrongly blamed for economic downturns, creating unnecessary tension.

Living under perpetual stress from these factors leaves individuals feeling vulnerable and uncertain. And for many, these pressures eventually boil over into anger.

Examples

  • Increased work demands and skill reskilling pressures are becoming commonplace in many industries.
  • Millennials and Gen Z face higher debt burdens compared to Boomers’ postwar opportunities.
  • Anti-immigrant sentiment in declining rural areas stems from perceived, not real, competition.

5. Tribalism Diverts Attention from Real Problems

Tribalism – the idea of dividing people into competing groups – often exacerbates societal tensions. Politicians frequently use fear-based narratives to channel valid grievances toward divisive, symbolic targets, such as immigrants or ethnic minorities.

While these narratives mobilize anger, they often sideline larger, systemic issues like inequality or job insecurity. By fostering tribal anger, leaders avoid accountability for solving real problems. This cyclical pattern creates both political deadlock and societal hostility.

Redirecting this focus requires underscoring shared needs. Acknowledge collective struggles without pointing fingers at scapegoats to address root causes of discontent and promote unity.

Examples

  • Brexit debates were driven by fear-based ideas about immigration rather than policy discussions.
  • “America First” rhetoric during Trump’s presidency used tribalism for political support.
  • Far-right parties in Europe capitalize on tribal anger rather than addressing economic reforms.

6. Misdirected Anger Leaves Global Crises Unaddressed

While people’s anger often targets specific communities or symbolic entities, larger global challenges – such as climate change, financial instability, or corporate impunity – remain inadequately addressed. Political distraction through tribalism directs public energy away from these urgent problems.

For example, major polluting corporations continue operations under minimal regulation, yet media narratives elevate less pressing issues. Without shifting priorities, societies face growing risks – from environmental disasters to unchecked corporate power.

Shifting public anger toward these productive goals is essential for long-term progress. Governments must act decisively to rebuild trust and recalibrate attention.

Examples

  • Corporate lobbying prevents meaningful environmental reforms.
  • Oil companies avoid scrutiny while dominating energy policies.
  • Nationalist rhetoric sidelines discussions on resource sustainability.

7. Positive Changes Seen in Some Nations

Not all countries face similar levels of economic distress. Canada and Australia have implemented reforms to stabilize their systems while reducing public resentment. These nations demonstrate that deliberate policies can enhance fairness and reduce inequality without compromising growth.

In both cases, a mix of stronger regulation, targeted welfare policies, and progressive taxation created thriving middle classes. Moreover, these reforms bolstered public trust in institutions, showcasing alternate examples of managing capitalism.

Success stories highlight that anger-driven societies aren’t inevitable. Reforms and proactive leadership can prevent crises.

Examples

  • Canada’s financial system remained stable post-2008.
  • Wage growth rates in Australia outpace other Western nations.
  • Norway’s sovereign wealth fund effectively redistributes wealth.

8. National Wealth Funds Could Reduce Inequality

One proposed solution to address inequality is the creation of national wealth funds. Using low-interest rates, governments could borrow money, invest in a variety of assets, and redistribute returns directly to citizens. This approach could help equalize wealth for individuals previously left behind.

Successful models exist, such as Norway’s oil-based fund. Countries could apply similar strategies to ensure long-term economic benefits while improving societal trust and reducing stress.

This method offers a tangible, direct way of giving people resources to pursue education, healthcare, and better living standards.

Examples

  • Norway’s fund improved living standards across its population.
  • Singapore uses similar funds to secure future citizens’ incomes.
  • The Alaska Permanent Fund pays annual dividends to state residents.

9. Regional Autonomy as a Testing Model

Another approach to economic reform is granting regions greater policy-setting autonomy. Localized experimentation allows governments to test innovative ideas suited to specific populations. These policies not only give citizens tailored solutions but also strengthen local democratic participation.

Learning from regional successes could help scale reforms. When individuals see direct results at their local level, they often regain trust in public institutions. This collaborative effort can drive positive trends without forcing universal solutions.

Examples

  • Germany’s regional policies target specific local industries.
  • U.S. states provide examples of legal experimentation like universal healthcare in Vermont.
  • Swiss cantons operate as semi-autonomous regions with tailored policies.

Takeaways

  1. Advocate policies that directly distribute wealth to citizens rather than prioritizing corporate bailouts in crises.
  2. Promote regional autonomy to test new ideas and foster local economic engagement.
  3. Support national wealth funds to equalize opportunities for all citizens over generations.

Books like Angrynomics