Book cover of Making a Point by David Crystal

David Crystal

Making a Point Summary

Reading time icon9 min readRating icon4 (281 ratings)

If punctuation marks were people, they’d be the kind who divide opinion, spark debates, and inspire both love letters and harsh criticism. What do these tiny symbols say about our communication and culture?

1: Punctuation Didn't Start With Writing

Punctuation, as we know it, began as a way to make speech easier to follow when transcribed into written language. Early languages operated without punctuation, and spaces between words weren’t even standard.

In the early days of written communication, there was no concept of spacing or distinct punctuation marks. Around 700 AD, spaces started to be used in England, though it wasn’t until 1100 AD that they appeared consistently in about half of inscriptions. Before this, punctuation was unnecessary because the concise, direct nature of inscriptions left little room for ambiguity.

Take the example "STAGNES" for "St. Agnes." At the time, people didn’t see the need for spaces since social context made the meaning obvious. In modern times, however, written contexts like “therapistsneedspecialtreatment” could cause misunderstandings. Should we read this as "Therapists need special treatment" or "The rapists need special treatment"?

Over time, punctuation evolved to eliminate ambiguities and improve readability. While spoken language flows naturally without punctuation, written language benefits immensely from these markers that break content into digestible pieces.

Examples

  • The phrase “therapistsneedspecialtreatment” illustrates how punctuation resolves ambiguity.
  • In early English, spaces only became common starting in the eighth century, taking centuries to gain widespread use.
  • Modern changes to punctuation, like shifting emphasis from italics to bold, reflect evolving communication tools like screens.

2: Punctuation Forms a Hierarchy

Punctuation can serve as a map for reading, organized into levels of importance that guide clarity. From spaces to periods to hyphens, punctuation is more than arbitrary—it conveys structure.

Spaces and paragraphs sit at the top of the punctuation hierarchy, dividing content on a grand scale. Periods and sentence dividers come next, and beneath them, marks like commas, colons, and hyphens help readers navigate smaller units of thought. During the telegraph era, periods were even spelled as "STOP" to avoid confusion from smudged penmanship.

Modern instant messaging has shifted how punctuation operates. Periods, for example, are now less necessary where line breaks divide sentences. The simple presence of a period in chats can suggest negative tones, such as displeasure or frustration. This subtle shift shows how punctuation’s meaning adapts with context.

Examples

  • Instant messages where “At the football field” (no period) sounds neutral, but “At the football field.” (with a period) feels irritated.
  • Periods could unify information, like in abbreviations “U.S.A.” or monetary figures such as “$6.30.”
  • Telegraph operators spelled out “STOP” to mimic sentence-final punctuation in an age of smudged handwriting.

3: Obsession Over Rules Can Backfire

Strict adherence to punctuation rules sometimes leads people to extreme behaviors. From grammatical sticklers to self-proclaimed enforcers, obsession with correctness exposes our emotional connections to language.

Two Americans exemplified this when they founded the Typo Eradication Advancement League (TEAL). Their mission was to travel across the country correcting punctuation errors on signs. While this sounds humorous, their adventure took a serious turn at the Grand Canyon. They corrected a historical sign, defacing a piece of cultural history and earning themselves a fine and a ban from national parks.

This incident reflects a broader problem: rigid views on punctuation stifle its creative and evolving nature. Even Mark Twain once joked about executing proofreaders who tinkered with his punctuation. This fixation reveals why some dismiss rules entirely.

Examples

  • TEAL’s journey ended in a $3,000 fine for tampering with a historic Grand Canyon sign.
  • Mark Twain’s telegram dramatized his disdain for proofreaders changing his work.
  • Over-correcting punctuation—like mistaking artistic typography for an error—risks harming creativity.

4: There Are Few Hard Punctuation Rules

What seems like a strict rule in punctuation often turns out to be flexible or riddled with exceptions. Thinking there’s one right way to punctuate causes confusion when reality proves more nuanced.

Teachers frequently tell students to place apostrophes before "s" to show possession—e.g., “the dog’s tail.” Yet possessive pronouns like “its” break this rule, causing endless mix-ups. Similarly, corporate names demonstrate how rules bend under pressure. Lloyds Bank, co-founded by two men named Lloyd, had to drop its apostrophe because users kept assuming it referred to one Lloyd.

In short, understanding the complexities of punctuation helps readers adapt to situations better than clinging stubbornly to rules.

Examples

  • People often misplace apostrophes in “its” because it doesn’t follow the same pattern as “Bob’s.”
  • The name Lloyds (bank) changed to accommodate public misunderstandings.
  • Publishers often adapt punctuation rules for readability or branding rather than strict correctness.

5: Creativity Thrives in Punctuation Play

Far from rigid, punctuation offers immense creative potential. Authors like E.E. Cummings and James Joyce illustrate the artistic flexibility of punctuation in evoking emotion and meaning.

Cummings famously experimented with punctuation to mirror themes in his work. For instance, his spatial arrangement of text represented aerial acrobats swinging through the air. By contrast, James Joyce deliberately omitted punctuation in parts of "Ulysses" to explore the stream-of-consciousness style, mimicking human thought patterns.

Such experimentation reminds readers that punctuation isn’t merely functional; it can elevate storytelling and communication to an art form.

Examples

  • E.E. Cummings used parentheses and spacing in “mortals)” to imitate physical motion.
  • Joyce’s "Ulysses" eschews punctuation in Molly Bloom’s soliloquy for realism.
  • Poets often rewrite traditional punctuation norms to create emotional resonance.

6: Technology Inspires New Punctuation Marks

The internet age has transformed punctuation, introducing symbols like emoticons and redefining old marks for digital use. These changes reshape language and reflect evolving context.

Computer programmers, for instance, gave new life to punctuation marks. The forward slash became vital for writing directories (e.g., “D:/Desktop”), and the invention of the backslash offered more versatility for coding. Simultaneously, emoticons entered casual conversations, adding emotional shades to otherwise plain text.

Notably, younger generations adapt quickly to leaving out punctuation entirely during texting, marking a growing divide between formal and informal communication.

Examples

  • Smiley faces now signify sarcasm, humor, or lightheartedness.
  • URLs like “McDonalds.com” omit apostrophes, influencing how brand names appear offline.
  • Coders innovated with symbols like the backslash for creating software.

Takeaways

  1. Experiment with punctuation creatively by omitting or replacing marks in informal writing.
  2. Practice recognizing ambiguity in phrases to appreciate how punctuation resolves confusion.
  3. Investigate the role of punctuation in casual versus formal communication through apps or social media.

Books like Making a Point