Book cover of You are Now Less Dumb by David McRaney

David McRaney

You are Now Less Dumb

Reading time icon21 min readRating icon3.9 (4,558 ratings)

Do you truly understand why you think, feel, and act the way you do? Think again, because your brain might be misleading you!

1. Your brain lies to you daily

Our brains distort reality more than we might believe, often leading us to misinterpret the world. Like an optical illusion, even clear and logical observations aren’t always as accurate as we assume. This happens because perception is highly personal and shaped by our biases and beliefs.

For instance, our experience of everyday phenomena like colors, smells, or textures may not align with others' experiences. This became evident in a 1951 study after a Dartmouth vs. Princeton football game. Each school's students detailed their version of events in such drastically opposite ways that it seemed they had attended entirely different games. The disparity arose from loyalty to their respective teams influencing how they viewed the match.

Acknowledging this makes us more cautious about accepting our perceptions as fact. Failing to remember these tendencies can leave us vulnerable to errors during emotionally charged events like sports games, debates, or personal conflicts. By recognizing this, we can learn to pause and challenge our assumptions.

Examples

  • Your favorite football team loses, and you blame biased referees even if evidence proves otherwise.
  • Witnesses to the same accident provide conflicting accounts based on their viewpoints or involvement.
  • A debate among friends about a movie turns heated because each perceives the story's "message" differently.

2. Actions shape attitudes and vice versa

Our behaviors influence how we think and feel, just as our thoughts and feelings shape how we act. When people act a certain way, their brains rationalize these actions, often leading to a shift in attitude or perspective.

Take the Benjamin Franklin effect: By asking a rival to lend him a book, Franklin turned the rival into a friend. Why? The act of helping prompted the rival's brain to think, "If I've done him a favor, I must like him." Additionally, research shows that simple actions, such as a pulling motion, can impact feelings. In one experiment, participants perceived symbols more positively when their task involved pulling a table toward themselves compared to pushing it away.

This phenomenon operates daily in small, surprising ways. Whether it's the clothes we choose or the favors we give, our brain aligns attitudes with actions to keep everything consistent.

Examples

  • A challenging workout feels rewarding because you interpret the effort as an investment in fitness.
  • Smiling, even when forced, can make you feel happier due to the brain’s reliance on facial feedback.
  • Team-building exercises build real camaraderie simply because collaboration fosters goodwill.

3. Post hoc reasoning often misguides us

When one event happens after another, people instinctively assume the first caused the second. This logical shortcut, known as the post hoc fallacy, leads us to connect unrelated occurrences.

Think about the placebo effect in medicine. A patient taking sugar pills instead of real medication might report improvement solely because they believe the treatment is working. Similarly, people mistakenly credit home remedies for getting better from colds or minor ailments when natural recovery is often the real cause.

This tendency of our brain to jump to conclusions can spiral into dangerous territory. Understanding post hoc reasoning helps us avoid false assumptions and seek better evidence before believing something is true.

Examples

  • You eat something unfamiliar, feel sick later, and unfairly blame the food despite no proof.
  • A lucky charm seems to ‘help’ before a test, reinforcing belief in its power.
  • A player attributes a winning streak to pre-game rituals instead of their evolving skillset.

4. The Halo Effect distorts judgments

First impressions hold incredible power over how we judge people. The Halo Effect occurs when one positive trait influences our overall perception of someone. This cognitive bias often leads us to overrate or underrate a person based on just one superficial characteristic.

A prime example is physical appearance. Studies show attractive individuals are often viewed as more intelligent and competent, regardless of their actual abilities. Similarly, the perceived skill of US pilots led their commanding officers to assume the pilots were excellent leaders, even without evidence to support that conclusion.

This bias can cloud judgment and even lead to errors, such as hiring someone based on likeability rather than skill. Becoming aware of our susceptibility to the Halo Effect can foster better decision-making.

Examples

  • A charming candidate aces their job interview but struggles in the role.
  • An attractive salesperson is trusted more, even without product knowledge.
  • A well-dressed speaker seems more credible than an equally skilled casual presenter.

5. Emotions often mislead us

Our emotions feel familiar and easy to interpret, but the reasons we assign to them are frequently wrong. The true cause of a mood or feeling is not always the one we believe it to be.

Research shows how environments can skew emotional judgments. In an experiment, men crossing a tall, shaky suspension bridge mistook their nervousness for attraction to a woman researcher stationed there. The findings revealed how people misattribute physical sensations to unrelated emotional states.

Learning how emotions operate under specific conditions can help us separate lasting feelings from fleeting reactions, which often takes some introspection.

Examples

  • Feeling irritable from hunger but blaming work stress instead.
  • Mistaking boredom with a task for an underlying dissatisfaction with your career.
  • Taking butterflies from public speaking as fear rather than excitement.

6. Negative feedback hits harder

When our beliefs are challenged, our immediate response isn’t to agree but to dig in deeper. Known as the “backfire effect,” this tendency is strengthened by how impactful negative feedback feels compared to positive reinforcement.

For instance, some individuals continued believing falsehoods about Barack Obama’s citizenship despite conclusive evidence debunking their claims. Similarly, people spend more time analyzing critical feedback than positive reviews, often to confirm their own biases.

Instead of letting disagreements further entrench us, stepping back to consider alternate views can break this cycle.

Examples

  • A teacher critiques your essay, and you fixate on disproving their points instead of accepting help.
  • During an argument with a friend, you cherry-pick flaws in their logic to stay "right."
  • Reading a negative review about your favorite book tempts you to dismiss it instead of reflecting.

7. We misjudge group norms

Most people conform to social rules without checking whether others actually agree with them. This misjudgment often happens when we presume a belief is held by the majority, but it isn’t.

For example, college drinking behaviors are less universal than assumed. A Princeton study found that, while most students weren't particularly fond of alcohol, they believed their peers loved it and thus drank to fit in. This same principle stops people from asking questions in crowds, as they think their misunderstanding is unique.

Pausing to evaluate whether group perceptions align with reality can foster freer self-expression.

Examples

  • Thinking everyone in a business meeting understands but realizing later that others were lost too.
  • Assuming peers are interested in a social trend when it’s discussed regularly but quietly disliked.
  • Buying into stereotypes about "majority culture" groups without firsthand inquiry.

8. Groupthink shapes values, for better or worse

Groups provide essential solidarity, but they also create rifts by dividing the world into insiders and outsiders. This ingroup-outgroup thinking can distort morals and cause social bias.

A survey divided by political affiliation revealed that members of each side claimed superior understanding of the other’s beliefs while dismissing those beliefs outright. Worse yet, exclusion often happens when members breach a group’s behavioral standards, as seen when Norwegians denounced a Christian terrorist by declaring he wasn’t a "true Christian."

Understanding this alignment allows individuals to act with more empathy and think outside their group's perspective.

Examples

  • Advocates of opposing policies fail to engage in civil discourse due to preconceived notions.
  • Friend groups ostracize a member after they act differently, attributing it to “never fitting in.”
  • Corporate teams dismiss outlier ideas, missing opportunities for innovation.

9. Clothing affects perception and performance

What you wear not only impacts how others perceive you, but it also changes your own behavior. Clothes carry psychological effects powerful enough to boost or hinder performance.

A study where participants wore doctor coats (versus painter coats) revealed that perceived authority influenced performance. Those in "doctor coats" solved more problems thoughtfully, associating the outfit with intelligence. Society-wide, business attire fosters trust in professional spaces – and deviating from stereotypes, such as wearing pantsuits, might even boost women’s hireability in corporate settings.

While clothing alone won’t define success, being mindful of its subtle power helps optimize situations like interviews or negotiations.

Examples

  • Dressing sharply impresses superiors before any work is presented.
  • Formal wear enforces seriousness during court appearances.
  • Employees in uniform feel greater responsibility compared to casual-wear workdays.

Takeaways

  1. Challenge your assumptions about people. Instead of making snap judgments, dig deeper and get to know them beyond surface traits or impressions.
  2. Learn to pause before attributing your feelings to obvious causes. Emotions are complex, and extra reflection can guide better decisions.
  3. When forming opinions about group norms or values, ask directly or observe more critically to avoid assumptions that lead you astray.

Books like You are Now Less Dumb