What do you do when the unthinkable happens, and you are the one leading? You build a plan, communicate clearly, and lead with heart.

1. The Virus Was Already There

COVID-19 had likely been spreading unnoticed in New York for weeks before the state's first confirmed case. Misinformation from federal authorities complicated the early response, as they incorrectly believed the virus was entering the U.S. from China via the West Coast. In reality, the virus was spreading from Europe and had already infiltrated communities undetected.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) exacerbated this issue by testing only individuals returning from China, ignoring travelers from regions like Europe. This misalignment created a false sense of security for New Yorkers, as confirmed cases seemed low. By the time the first case was detected in early March, transmission was already widespread.

This error in federal judgment highlighted why timely, accurate information is essential. While some states declared emergencies in early February, New York functioned on incomplete data, unwittingly leaving millions at risk.

Examples

  • The CDC only tested travelers from Wuhan, China, while ignoring potential cases from Europe.
  • By March 1, cases were already in the thousands, but mitigation efforts were delayed due to flawed assumptions.
  • WHO had declared a global emergency on January 30, yet local response remained slow due to misinformation.

2. Clear Communication Keeps Panic at Bay

Governor Cuomo knew that effectively managing public fear was as critical as managing the virus. His decision to address New Yorkers daily with transparent, factual updates was part of this strategy. He aimed to share information without causing unnecessary alarm, choosing accessible language and tone.

However, a misstep with the term "containment zone" early on led to public confusion in New Rochelle, a hot spot north of New York City. Residents assumed it meant they were physically confined, rather than the virus being controlled locally. This was a crucial lesson for Cuomo on how miscommunication can erode trust.

Cuomo's ability to balance honesty with calm authority enabled him to connect with the public. The briefings became a reliable source of consistent information during a time when uncertainty was rampant.

Examples

  • Daily briefings helped clarify state actions and offered New Yorkers a sense of stability.
  • Avoiding alarmist language, Cuomo explained containment strategies in understandable terms.
  • After the "containment zone" misunderstanding, Cuomo improved his messaging to prevent further fear.

3. Testing Was a Broken System

Testing for COVID-19 in the U.S. was overcomplicated by a decentralized system reliant on private labs and manufacturers. New York quickly identified this hurdle and decided to develop its own test. By securing more reliable reagents and building capacity locally, the state overcame early challenges.

Initially, every state had to mail samples to CDC’s Atlanta lab, limiting testing speed. Even when the CDC distributed testing kits, New York discovered they produced false positives and relied on limited reagents available only through the agency.

By creating its own test, New York reduced delays, increased accuracy, and tested more people. This effort positioned the state as a leader in reliable testing, crucial for tracking and tackling the virus.

Examples

  • Limited CDC testing led to massive delays, with results taking days or even weeks.
  • New York’s COVID-19 test provided faster turnaround and improved accuracy.
  • By scaling up with commercial reagents, New York led the nation in per capita testing.

4. Public Health Systems Matter

The pandemic exposed glaring weaknesses in the U.S. public health infrastructure. States like New York struggled to meet unprecedented demands for hospital beds, ventilators, and coordination among medical facilities. Unlike other nations with unified health systems, the decentralized U.S. model created inefficiencies during the crisis.

Governor Cuomo introduced a "Surge & Flex" system to address these gaps, enhancing hospital coordination and resource allocation. Previously, state hospitals lacked a strategy to manage excess capacity as a single unified network. Cuomo’s approach allowed for the sharing of patients, staff, and equipment between facilities to prevent collapse.

This underlined the need for investment in public health as a national priority—not just during emergencies, but as an ongoing strategy.

Examples

  • By late March, New York hospitals needed double their existing capacity.
  • “Surge & Flex” created a 24/7 resource center to monitor hospital availability in real time.
  • Equipment shortages highlighted the risks of relying on federal help during emergencies.

5. Vulnerability Builds Trust

As a seasoned politician, Cuomo understood the risks of showing emotion publicly. However, the gravity of the pandemic demanded authentic leadership, and Cuomo found that expressing his fears and empathy helped him connect with New Yorkers.

His most personal moment, announcing Matilda’s Law to protect seniors, demonstrated this approach. He named the policy after his mother, openly admitting his concern for her safety. Alongside urging safety measures, he encouraged New Yorkers to show love and support for their own families.

This willingness to be emotionally honest made Cuomo relatable to the public, inspiring trust and cooperation amid an anxious time.

Examples

  • Announced Matilda's Law to protect senior citizens while sharing his own family concerns.
  • A teary briefing where Cuomo expressed gratitude for health efforts resonated widely.
  • Emphasized emotional strength in daily addresses, creating solidarity with viewers.

6. Federal Leadership Was Missing

Governor Cuomo encountered numerous roadblocks from federal leadership, led by President Trump. Trump's dismissive attitude toward the virus and focus on reopening the economy conflicted with state efforts to save lives. Requests for federal support in securing protective equipment and ventilators often went unanswered.

Later, when the situation improved slightly, Trump called for reopening states quickly, a move that Cuomo deemed reckless. Cuomo’s insistence on a phased reopening plan supported by evidence eventually prevailed, showing the importance of local decision-making when national leadership falters.

Examples

  • Trump minimized the virus as a minor flu and delayed action on medical supplies.
  • New York lacked access to manufacturers due to federal bureaucracy.
  • Cuomo’s appeal to legal authorities helped prevent premature reopening in the state.

7. Protests Added Complexity

The murder of George Floyd during New York’s reopening added another layer of challenge. Protests erupted not just against police brutality but also systemic racism, and crowds posed risks to public health. Cuomo balanced support for public expression with reminders about testing and masks.

His leadership ensured safety measures became accessible for protesters through free tests and mask mandates in private settings. By focusing on shared reform goals while advocating health precautions, Cuomo demonstrated leadership during overlapping crises.

Examples

  • Signed orders enabling protesters to get free COVID-19 tests.
  • Mask mandates for businesses helped protect both staff and attendees.
  • Supported protests while emphasizing the importance of continued social distancing.

8. United Communities Flatten Curves

Despite early doubts about whether New York could control its outbreak, citizens proved their resilience. State efforts included mobilizing 100,000 health workers, with thousands volunteering to come out of retirement or cross state lines.

New Yorkers united through shared sacrifices, cooperating with safety measures and supporting each other through the crisis. This collective effort achieved what many thought impossible: reversing the pandemic’s trajectory in one of its hardest-hit areas.

Examples

  • Retired and out-of-state health professionals joined efforts.
  • Elmhurst’s 50 percent infection rate was dramatically reduced over two months.
  • Citizens adhered to early lockdown rules, enabling long-term reopening plans.

9. Leadership Takes Continual Learning

Cuomo’s experience demonstrates how adaptability, honesty, and community-building can guide leadership through unprecedented challenges. His approach evolved as new issues arose, from protests to misinformation.

Learning from mistakes, such as poor phrasing in briefings, and being flexible enough to lead during complex scenarios reinforced Cuomo’s determination to protect his state. His efforts to unify and inspire New Yorkers demonstrated the importance of steady, empathetic governance during turbulent times.

Examples

  • Changed messaging strategies based on public confusion and feedback.
  • Combined emotional appeals with data-driven transparency in daily briefings.
  • Adjusted policies in real-time to match changing public health trends.

Takeaways

  1. Prepare for crises by focusing on clarity: Leaders should practice communicating critical decisions effectively, avoiding technical terms or language that can confuse or alarm people.
  2. Build local leadership: Relying on federal systems can lead to delays. Strengthening regional resources like hospitals and emergency response systems ensures readiness for future challenges.
  3. Lead with empathy: Being open about fears and emotions can inspire others. Demonstrating humanity as a leader fosters stronger connections with communities in times of need.

Books like American Crisis